The Newport Beach Triathlon is scheduled to take place on October 1, 2017. The race is scheduled to take place at The Newport Marina. The problem, as reported on californiatriathlon.org, is that the race does not have the permits or contracts in place to hold the event.
As of this morning, signups were being accepted through Active.com
According to Brian Ross, the executive director of Newport Dunes Resort and Marina (quotes excerpted from article which appeared on californiatriathlon.org) – Note – the statement by The Newport Dunes Resort mistakenly refers to Pacific Sports as Water Sports.
…On that note, one may conclude that registration for the triathlon is being sold under false pretenses — the event is neither contracted nor permitted to occur. We have asked Water Sports, LLC, to cease and desist using our business name and address (a total of three requests to stop have been issued to Jack Caress).
I checked on the Pacific Sports site this morning, and they still show that the event is to take place at Newport Dunes.
What makes this situation all the more troubling is the history that Pacific Sports has with canceling events:
The Brooklyn Triathlon, originally scheduled for 2013 was postponed until 2014.
6 days before the Triathlon was to take place, it was canceled. This was reported in The Brooklyn Daily:
The stated reason for the cancellation, was that that it was over a dispute regarding the police fees associated with the required road closures. The article I linked did seem to put most of the blame on the city. From everything I’ve gathered, I think there is blame to go around to both sides. The race should not have set prices and accepted money without some idea as to what the police fees would have been.
“We did expect a fee assessment, but we thought it would about one-fifth of this,” said Jack Caress of Pacific Sports. “What’s really troubling is there was no transparency, no detail — I’ve asked for months to see the deployment. Well, $127,000 for two miles — I cant fathom what they would need, and they wont disclose it.”
Comments on their Facebook page are consistently negative. Athletes posted about never receiving their refunds, or the lengths they had to go through to get their money back.
The comment by Pacific Sports is head scratching. They say that they were issuing refunds as cashflow allows. All the while, they were sitting on entry fees for months (over a year for those that transferred their entry from 2013). It is understandable that they may have used revenue to pay for services related to the race that did not happen. But this is not an instance where weather or an act of God prevented the race from happening. This event was cancelled solely because of poor planning. The athletes should not be left holding the bag.
The initial email I received regarding this company also indicatedthat many athletes have not received refunds.
Los Angeles Triathlon
3 days before it was scheduled, the 2016 L.A. Triathlon was canceled. The below linked article was posted on Triathlon.com.
The reasons that were given for the L.A Triathlon cancellation were once again, the supposed lack of an itemized bill (which the city of Torrence disputes) and a $7,200 bill that he received to be paid to a neighboring city – which was to cover costs relating to signage communicating road closures.
[Caress] was fully aware of what the breakdown was,” and “did know what the billing was for,” says Fran Fulton, the city’s economic development manager. Fulton says that her office and Caress had had monthly meetings leading up to the event and that “if he had disputes, he had several months to bring it up.” She says the prepayment policy had been in place for the past two years, and nothing about it changed in 2016.
What I found interesting was that Caress says that the cancellation of the Brook Triathlon likely cost his company $100,000 and the cancellation of the Los Angeles Triathlon would cost him $150,000 to $250,000. I cannot quite fathom why someone would take such a large loss over a $7200 invoice and a delay in getting an itemized statement. Presumably the losses would be less if participants weren’t refunded.
Given the comments of the supposed venue for the Newport Beach Triathlon, I would be hesitant to hand my money over for this race. If I already have, I would closely monitor the situation. I am hoping this article helps to get some answers sooner rather than later.
I also am left to wonder what role Active.com should take. I am not saying that they are at fault for the cancellations. But at what point do they have a responsibility to cut ties with a company that has a history of canceling or postponing events?
I have sent a message to Pacific Sports through their Facebook page, and have yet to receive a response. I also reached out to the Newport Dunes Resort to confirm that nothing has changed regarding the statement that were made in the article in CaliforniaTriathlon.org. The person responding confirmed that nothing changed. I have not yet been able to connect with Brian Ross personally. If there is any additional news regarding the status of the Triathlon and the venue, I will post an update.
Please consider a contribution to help support the site. Contributions help to offset costs associated with running the site and help to enable me to compensate those that assist in data collection, etc.
Thanks to all of you that that support Marathon Investigation!